26 Aug 2007

Won't fixing

Submitted by Karl Hagen
The title is not an instance of editorial error, nor the start of a question (e.g., "Won't fixing one thing break something else?" but evidence of a new compound verb with a very unusual structure. I first saw it on a developer's issue board. "Clearing my issue queue. I don't think these fixes are going to go in anyway - won't fixing."
Topic: 
Share: 
19 Jul 2007
This is part 3 of a series analyzing the College Board's view of English grammar. In part 1 I reviewed the general standards for the SAT writing test and argued that they were vague. In part 2, I began to reverse-engineer the grammatical framework used by the test makers and found numerous errors in the explanatory answers that the College Board provides with its practice tests.
Share: 
6 Jul 2007

Leave a comment, proofread a book

Submitted by Karl Hagen
You'll notice that I've enabled comments for new posts. I'm using the reCAPTCHA service, which both provides a strong captcha challenge and helps proofread books that have been scanned. As someone who used to be very active on Distributed Proofreaders (no time any longer, alas), I think reCAPTCHA is a stupendous idea. So, help create e-texts. Leave lots of comments.
Share: 
5 Jul 2007
This is part 2 of a series.
(Part 1, Part 3)

The instructions for the writing sections of the the SAT ask the test taker to use the conventions of "standard written English" in finding correct answers. But as I noted in part 1 of this article, the public specifications as to what that means, are vague.

Share: 
2 Jul 2007
The following article is part 1 in a series.

Some time ago, I wrote about a flawed question, in The Official SAT Study Guide from the College Board. In trying to understand the thinking of the question writer, I reviewed the official explanations to the test that are available on the College Board's website through its online course.

Share: 

Pages

Subscribe to Polysyllabic RSS